Saturday, December 28, 2019

Tips to Make Nail Polish Dry Faster

No one wants to wait around for nail polish to dry. There are lots of rumors of ways to get polish to dry more quickly, but which actually work? These are the best quick-drying nail polish tips submitted by readers. Feeling scientific? Take a look at the chemistry behind quick-dry methods and learn which really work. Tips From Readers Readers have tried everything to get nails to dry fast. Here are some of their top recommendations: Cooking spray works and it doesnt dry out your hands. Dip your fingers in cold water for about five minutes and let them air dry for five minutes. Step 1: Always apply thin coats.Step 2: Bow on nails and run nails through ice-cold water.Step 3: Apply additional coats if needed and repeat steps.Step 4: Wait for 20 to 30 minutes before doing anything.Step 5: Cant be patient? Buy yourself fast drying nail polish and/or a topcoat like Seche Vite. Turn on the cold water in the sink on and put your hands under it. Theyll be done in 30 seconds. Putting your hands in ice water makes your nails dry faster. It sounds insane but oil sprays and quick-drying treatments do not actually make your polish dry faster. They do, however, reduce the likelihood that youre going to ding-up/smudge your polish while its drying, by forming a slick surface on top. Quick-dry topcoats are similar. They dont dry the polish underneath, but they do harden on top of it. If youre not careful, you can end up scraping your polish right off if the under-layers are still tacky when you reach into your bag for your phone. It still makes sense to use the above methods when youre trying to preserve a brand-new manicure. Its also important to understand how they work so you can achieve the best results! I was in a hurry and was about ready to just remove my polish, but to my surprise, cooking spray totally worked for me. My nails dried almost immediately. It makes me wonder about the chemicals in the cooking spray though! I add a little bit of nail polish remover to the nail polish and mix it really well. You can add it to your colors and/or your top clear coat. The alcohol in the remover makes the polish dry much faster than ice water or a hairdryer. It also turned that old gloopy polish back to normal! Try a hairdryer on medium setting or try sticking your hand in a freezer. It may seem crazy but they work. Do not use heat. All it does is melt the polish! Definitely use ice-cold water! Dries em in a heartbeat! Pam (you know, the cooking spray?) works wonders! All you do is spray your nails and leave it for about 45 seconds. Youll have to wash your hands well though since it makes them kinda greasy. Thin coats dry fast. Try doing multiple thin coats instead of one or two thick gloppy coats. Trust me, it works wonders. Ice-cold water, Pam spray, or a fan work really well. Apply a coat of peanut butter and it will work as long as you dont touch anything right away—and later on, youll have a nice snack! Nail polishes are solutions of a polymer and need only to have the solvent removed. Blowing on them can cause blushing. Stand with your hands above a non-electric central heating convector and you should get nice glossy nails. I just use a quick-drying topcoat. That way I can get my favorite polish without having to wait forever to get on with my life. It takes about a minute to get really hard nails, but I guess it depends on what you use and how many layers of polish you added. Air dust them or put your hand in ice-cold water for three minutes to dry them.  You can always spray cooking spray on them just in case!

Friday, December 20, 2019

Pros and Cons of a Eurozone Breakup Essay - 737 Words

Assess the advantages and disadvantages of a Eurozone breakup. In the past few months, the likelihood of a Eurozone breakup has been escalating due to increasing tensions in the monetary union. The departure of problematic periphery countries like Greece from the Eurozone would have many implications onto Europe and the rest of the world. If the Eurozone were to break up, whether partially or completely, it would send the rest of the world into panic and economic turmoil. The countries departing the euro would have to revert back to its old currency and as such face a significant devaluation. Thus people who have their savings in these countries would see a significant fall in value of their savings. In order to prevent this from†¦show more content†¦Meanwhile, the depositors in other Eurozone countries which are seen to be at risk of leaving the Euro, such as Spain, Portugal and Italy, may transfer their money to the safety of a German bank account. This would spark a banking crisis in Southern Europe as banks suffer from liquidity s hortages. Despite the negative outcomes of a Eurozone breakup, it is worth to note that it may be the best solution to the current debt crisis. At the moment, the crisis has reached the stage where it may no longer be both financially and politically feasible to keep the whole Eurozone together. A prime example is Greece. Financially, the Eurozone may be better off letting Greece go, as efforts to reduce its national debt by offering exorbitant bailouts have been a huge drain on funds. Political wise, the Greek public has rejected the austerity measures imposed as a condition for the bailouts and have even voted for political parties which rejected austerity. Thus the funds used to bail out Greece can be better used on larger, more integral Eurozone countries which are more determined to reduce their debt levels. Lastly, a Eurozone breakup may have adverse effects on the remaining member countries in the form of rising bond yields. This is because investors will be wary of lending t o struggling Eurozone countries in fear of the contagion spreading and a further breakup of theShow MoreRelatedIs a Common Currency in Europe Sustainable? Essay1701 Words   |  7 PagesThe continued existence of the Eurozone is in question, as demanded bond yields in Italy and Greece ascend to new heights, and governments are unable to budget their future outlays. Austerity is often proposed as a means to allow these troubled governments to pay back their debts in the future, but many question whether it can truly lead to growth. The breakup of the Eurozone, while very possible, threatens to spread financial instability to other European nations and even the United States. Originally

Thursday, December 12, 2019

SENIOR FLASHBACK Essay Example For Students

SENIOR FLASHBACK Essay Time to Say GoodbyeBy Jamie WarrenThe future stretches before me, waiting for me to create the work of art that will become my life. We have entered an age for celebration, an era to memorialize who we were, who we are and who we will eventually become. Celebrate this milestone greater then all the others, for it is the time we have spent here in our high school careers that will always be held close to heart. Graduation is two weeks away, which for most of us does not seem possible. As we look back at these past four long but fulfilling years, there are some things that we shall never forget. Its hard to believe that at one point we were little freshmen entering into these doors, with no idea what was in store for us. Four years have passed since that first day, and we have made decisions that will frame our futures. After years of studying, filling out applications, scholarships, and taking tests, we are now thrown into the real world, where there are seldom retakes, second chances are only a memory of yesteryear, and honor codes are the way of life. As freshman, we came home from school with the mentality that we were no longer children, but rather had entered into a new stage of life.Everything seemed different and new; we werent the big kids on campus anymore. We no longer were the persons being looked up to, but rather were the persons looking up to an entire school of older students. We remember joining our firsts clubs, going to dances, and having Orientation days. ? Does wise fool mean anything to you? ?Junior year we had our first taste of authority; we had become upperclassmen. We gained new responsibilities and had to step it up in school. Times had surely begun to change. The days of complaining about dress codes and school sweaters had transformed into days chock-full of drudgery. College was in the near future, and things such as the SATs were on the horizon. We had our first prom, and some of us were in the midst of our first loves. As we look b ack on our high school careers, we shall take into consideration that most of the fondness incorporated with our time here is because of firsts. During our high school days, we underwent new and trying experiences. We fell in and out of love, grew to adults, and encountered trying times. We learned that we are neither invincible nor free from suffering, and bad things do happen to good people. Our times here can all be considered a learning experience, during which we discovered the value of friendship and the importance of individualism. At last, we have approached a knot in the path of life, the closing of one door and the opening of another. As seniors, we are facing the conclusion of our days here at Cross and the beginning of the rest of our lives. You may never again see those who are sitting next to you today, however you will always remember the tears you cried, the hugs you have shared and the smiles you have exchanged. As we face the conclusion of our youth and embark on our new journey into adulthood, we will confront innumerable challenges. This is not a time to dread, but rather it is a period of wonderment, an era of questioning, and a time for the fulfillment of dreams. When we face difficult times in college and life thereafter, we can always look back on our memories from high school. We will always cherish the thoughts of our firsts, classes, friends, and sports teams. .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 , .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 .postImageUrl , .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 , .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005:hover , .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005:visited , .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005:active { border:0!important; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005:active , .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005 .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud864e194576b6ae53c7f9f914b95a005:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Shakespeare's Othello - The Motivations of Iago in EssayAll of our friends and teachers, who had made the transition into high school an easier one, shall yet again aid in this life metamorphoses. Remember, Your only successful when you reach your unreachable goals. Set your goals higher than you can reach, if you can already reach your goals then your not really reaching for anything at all.

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

Moot Essay Example For Students

Moot Essay When a playwrights subject is the tortuous machinations of the Federal Government, he doesnt need a wild imagination to figure out that the most suitable dramatic genre is likely to be farce. As Milwaukee Repertory Theaters resident playwright John Leicht pored over the yellowing American Civil Liberties Union files of The Progressive case, he discovered that he had a surreal circus right in his hands. When reality turns as absurd as it did in Madison, Wisc. in 1979, the playwrights job of turning public events into theatrical comedy is essentially Moot. After his successful 1985 courtroom play, An American Journey, which focused on the late 50s killing of a Milwaukee man by two local police officers (and that crimes subsequent cover-up), Leicht had vowed never to write another play that involved wading through boxes of court transcripts. But lunch with Eunice Edgar, head of the Wisconsin chapter of the ACLU, destroyed that tenuous resolve. Knowing that Leicht had a penchant for dramatizing local political history, Edgar suggested he might enjoy reading how a tiny, alternative newspaper in Madison had taken on a fair-sized chunk of the governments Executive Branch, with all of its expensive, dutiful lawyers. And it was the government that lost. The celebrated legal battles surrounding the Progressive are well known to students of legal arguments for freedom of the press. A young journalist named Howard Morland, concerned that the general public was being hoodwinked by scientific jargon and thus disconnected from the nuclear weapons debate, set out to write a detailed, yet simple, guide explaining how the hydrogen bomb actually worked. He figured that such an article would bring home the idea that the bomb was real, and contribute to an open national discourse on the subject. Unfortunately for the well-meaning writer, the government took a dim view of such openness. Citing national security, the Carter Administration hauled out all its legal guns to stop publication of the article, now inaccurately branded as an instruction manual for backyard nuclear wannabees. Secrecy and power True farce ensued when it became clear that Morlands article was based entirely on facts that were readily available on the shelves of public libraries even though the information had never been officially declassified. The incredulous Leicht discovered that even Morlands high-school physics book (where much useful information on nuclear matters could be gleaned) was, at one point, classified. During the trial, the defendants never received clearance to speak in their own defense, and one judge was not legally free to read the article he was supposedly judging. Ultimately the article was leaked to papers across the country on the Associated Press wires and the government found itself in the impossible position of needing to prosecute the entire newspaper-reading population of the United States. The slippery affair fell out of the governments hands, and the attempt to obtain a restraining order was finally dropped, but not before the Progressive made headlines nationwide. If the powers-that-be overreacted, Leicht found the affairs liberal protagonists far from blameless the Progressives editor loved the role of first-amendment martyr, while his writer was overly naive. Other media outlets were at first hostile to the magazines cause, then, when the case was almost won, rapidly change the color of their editorial ink. Leicht became increasingly convinced that this incredible chain of events was less about Morlands article than it was about the governments conviction that secrecy (however needless) goes hand in hand with absolutist power. The self-righteous figures on both sides were ripe for ridicule on stage, and Leicht decided that they needed to be pushed into a still more absurd theatrical environment. .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 , .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 .postImageUrl , .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 , .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17:hover , .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17:visited , .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17:active { border:0!important; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17:active , .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17 .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u594951cc09b0188d0e0b251913b2bd17:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Tangible ghosts EssayA full-fledged circus Moot, therefore, was cast as a fast-moving farce, full of clownish physicality and crackling one-liners. Names were changed (although hardly to protect the innocent) and no character escaped the brandish of caricature. The government side was dominated by a clown-faced, threatening lawyer (Daniel Mooney), reveling nastily in his quest for control, while the scatterbrained opposition became a merciless indictment of the self-serving, disorganized political Left. The countless rapid-free scenes were ideally suited to Leichts elliptical writing style. A New American Play grant of $80,000 from the Charlottesville-based W. Alton Jones Foundation allowed the Rep to conduct several workshops of the piece, and enabled director John Dillon to fly with his concept of the production as a full-fledged circus a bold choice that Dillon felt would encourage the actors to take the biggest possible leaps. Dillon and his designers took off for the Circus World Museum in Baraboo, Wisc., researching old-time circus music and hiring a clowning consultant. Interns were coerced into dressing as clowns and selling popcorn in the Reps normally staid lobby. Scenic designer John Story crafted a huge, intentionally overblown setting dominated by a massive red-lipped, laughing mouth a cross between a circus big-top and a warped atomic cafe. Costumer Charles Berliners designs included eagle suits for the plays chirping judges. The prop department went into high gear and built a multitude of oversized wonders: colossal file cabinets from which faceless bureaucrats emerged to bark down phones; a typewriter-carrying desk-cycle that allowed the editor of Bobs Populist Review to race on- and off-stage at top speed; a mechanical media machine with cameras and microphones as arms; a walking, talking, video box that screeched commands to underlings. Sitting quietly in the opening-night crowd, watching his personal quest blown up to bigger-than-life proportions, was Morland himself. Having spent much of the 80s on the lecture circuit speaking about the Progressive case, Morland found himself immensely flattered and very amused by the plays take on the central events of his career. Erwin Knoll, his real-life editor, had also been to Milwaukee, and his initial skepticism about the script had turned into amusement when he saw Dillons raucous production. Still-radical Progressive assistant editor Sam Day (whom Leicht had unkindly characterized as a sniveling nerd) had thankfully not attended the show, being too busy protesting nuclear installations in Ohio. Behind Morlands good humor were hints of disappointment that the auspicious legal battle that had catapulted him to fame had been treated in Moot as a circus, but he insisted that Leicht had caught all the spirit of the story, even if considerable artistic licence had been taken with the chronology of events. On the playwrights part, there is fresh resolve to turn away from recent history as subject matter. His next project, he says, will be a play about Thersites, a minor character in the Iliad, and the first man in recorded history to speak out against authority. It remains to be seen whether Leicht will dress him in a police uniform or a business suit or the baggy pants of a clown.